#every time they had an argument
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
ok someone please correct me if i'm wrong but am i weird for thinking those 'audiobooks don't count as reading' posts are ableist as fuck????
#ramble#my first thought was like: how is this even a debate what about blind people. not every book comes in braille but MOST have an audiobook#or dyslexic people#you still enjoyed the book!! you still absorbed it!!! you got EXACTLY the same thing as people who read the words!!!#how does it not count????#i guess you miss out on the 'learning new vocab' you get through seeing the words but also#i don't really do audiobooks but i do a lot of podcasts esp fiction podcasts#and i have ABSOLUTELY picked up new stuff from there that helps with my writing#someone please explain how this is even an argument of COURSE it counts????#idk in my opinion finishing a book means 'i put the words in my brain and i thought about them and i enjoyed a story'#not 'i held a stack of paper in my hands for a bit'#i'm v lucky that i do have time to sit and read. and whenever i commute anywhere it's public transport so i CAN bring a book with me#but if i didn't have the free time or had to drive for hours everywhere i would be STOKED to still get to enjoy books#it's been REALLY bothering me lmao idk why i feel so strongly#for some reason it's giving the same energy as like. being told you can't take a comic or manga from the library bc it's not a 'real' book#of course it's a real book it's a story somebody wrote down#i can see this spiralling into 'if you have a kindle you aren't reading'. you have to sniff the paper. feel the papercuts
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
Seeing people say that we never see the Doctor and Ruby talking for more than 30 seconds makes me think 73 Yards and Dot and Bubble has just clouded their memories because the first four episodes of this era are almost nothing but the Doctor and Ruby talking and bonding.




Yeah, the Doctor-lite episodes meant we haven't had as much lately, but so many are going on as there's been none at all, as if every episode before 73 Yards was like Rogue where they were mostly separated in their own plotlines.
#doctor who#dw#fifteenth doctor#ruby sunday#ncuti gatwa#millie gibson#and don't get me started on the tardis bookends discourse#that argument lost all credibility when the same people insisted the ending of rogue be moved to the tardis#for no reason other than they wanted it in the tardis#it was exactly the type of scene they said the season was lacking#but didn't count because it wasn't in the tardis#same as with boom#one of the reasons they don't do tardis scenes at the start and end of every episode is because they get rather repetative#if you started rogue with the doctor and ruby in the tardis it would just end up being a repeated of the devil's chord#they decide to do bridgerton and get all dressed up#we don't really need a scene explaining why they're there#it is built into the whole show that they are just roamers#often randomly showing up in places and trying to have fun#for them going to a regency ball is no different than going to a club is for most people#wildest one was someone complaining why they were in wales at the start of 73 yards#they argued that because we didn't get a scene in the tardis we had no idea if being there was intentional or not#but that is irrelevant#the tardis often just lands in random places and the doctor and co have no idea where they are until they step outside#so many episodes start with them stepping outside and going “where the hell are we?”#everything that could've been said in the tardis was said outside it#there was no need to split that between two locations#especially when one actors time is limited#this all feels tied into the ongoing discourse about shows being longer#which many say is to it in more character beats#but honestly just feels like a hunger for more content
144 notes
·
View notes
Text
Nya has the best writing out of anyone in skybound an I will not hear otherwise
(this is just a rant but I will finish my argument with evidence soon but I was feeling like yelling at phone)
Just watched a video completely butchering her character.
I’m fuming about Nya’s treatment in general like RRRRR SHE IS LIKE THE BEST WRITTEN. Most people I see talk about her never tried to see Nya’s motivation.
And because she’s grumpy and won’t take bullshit treatment. And a large part of the audience Treat her like she’s a brat for it like…
Her ark against all odds is great. The only reason so many people don’t get that is ALL because of the awful framing and them focusing on Jay at all the wrong times I PROMISE YOU.
The audience is made to focus on Jay’s feelings in moments that should’ve been about her.
Nya always thought she would end up with Jay like she said later on. She always loved him She wasn’t trying to hurt or play with his feelings but she had bigger problems, and she simply didn’t want to be dating him. Because she hated how that would make her be perceived. Which was the issues that she overcame by the end.
She is frustrated by way she’s perceived by the city. They only see her as her gender. A self insert of sorts. (There’s a scene about it first ep subtle but boils my blood) Not a person. She HATES IT.
BRRRR
Nya has A lot more going on like it was never her Job to walk on eggshells around Jays feelings. She was having a lot harder of a time that first episode but more screen time was dedicated to Jays moping about her.
Just AAA ggghg
LIKE EVERYONE REWATCH SKYBOUND AND FOCUS ON NYA Specifically. Ignore how much the narrative drags you to look at Jay. I swear Nya’s struggle is shockingly the most well written bit
#I’ll be back with my evidence when I am more coherent#Oli rant#but here’s this for now#I watched something and I had to rant#her ark is so misunderstood and it’s entirely the fault of the framing#like the scene where the talk show host ask some basic questions and fully invades her space at focuses on JAY?#like she is leaning away in that scene I do not care about Jay’s feelings right now SIR back the fuck up#and there’s many more times where the FOCUS SHOULD BE ON HER#but Skyboud sure tries really hard to care Nya#skybound slander#oli’s skybound insanity#ninjago skybound#ninjago#ninjago jay#ninjago nya#nya jiang#nya ninjago#nya smith#ninjago thoughts#like I love Skybound Jay but come on#that guy was not Justified in his actions#Nya is actually right in every argument S6 And I’m dead serious#oli chat
138 notes
·
View notes
Text
If i had a nickel for every time I've become unreasonably attached to a human male character from a BioWare game with dark hair and brown eyes who you meet in the very first mission of the game, and has trust issues either with himself or others or both, and is also voiced by Raphael Sbarge, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot but it's weird that it's happened twice.
Im talking about them


#mass effect#kaidan alenko#sw kotor#carth onasi#anyways I cant stop playing kotor#i made a character for romancing carth because I had to#her name is jery and she's kinda a hardass and I love her#and I stg I keep calling carth caid like my brain is trying to meld them both into one guy#but they're not#i love how carth is literally incapable of having a normal conversation with anyone ever#i swear every time he says something he lands himself in an argument#due to the autism
188 notes
·
View notes
Text
#smoochum#ooohh i do not like this thing very much#like i guess you could try to make the argument that it's almost cute from some angles but that's#a stretch#bald#HI!!!! it's me from the FUTURE#if you saw mudkip and marshtomp yesterday‚ please blame tumblr's fucked up queue system#i had to rearrange the queue a little bit and somehow those two managed to get blasted right up to the top#this. just seems to happen every time i have to rearrange the queue. so sorry about that folks#i did NOT skip the entire rest of gen 2. you'll get them now#but mudkip and marshtomp will be back there. out of order
50 notes
·
View notes
Note
hi! noticed the ask by the anon about the reactions to rosegarden and i can't help but wonder...
do you think any of them would have some reservations because of the oz in oscar's head thing? i reckon there may be some slight lingering intensity for each member regarding him so there's a chance they could be wary... but more so for ruby and oscar, rather than exclusively ruby
I answered the last ask on the assumption that them becoming canon wouldn't happen until after the war is won and the Oz curse is broken. Simply because I don't think either of them have the time or capacity to tackle that sort of relationship before the main plot is resolved. So in the hypothetical situation that they would get together and it's before the curse is broken, I think there's a chance some of the people around them might be a bit wary. At least Qrow, Tai, and maybe Yang. However, with it being so close to the final fight, it would probably be the least of anyone's concerns at that time. "Seeing as the world might end in three weeks, so long as those two are happy for whatever time we have left, I don't really care if Oz is around for it or not", if you know what I mean?
That being said, I think I am too biased to answer this in a yes-and kind of way. I know you're probably asking in good faith, but in full transparency, I'm pretty jaded by how often this particular topic gets brought up. Since this is not the first time and probably won't be the last, I'm going to take this as an opportunity to share my stance on this idea as a whole.
Ozpin's place within Oscar and RG's stories is one of conflict; which is what all stories revolve around. And it is not, nor has it ever been, a deal breaker for RG's relationship to me. The Ozcarnation curse is an allegory for a few things. The first is simply growing up. RWBY is a coming of age story, and Oscar isn't the only one going through that arc. But this conflict and grief of how he doesn't get to choose the kind of person he wants to be - largely because of the people he's met and things he's experienced - is not unique to him. The curse is just a fantasized and exaggerated version of it.
The next one isn't so much an allegory as it is plainly stated in the text, but it's a story about choice. It's about how even when we are irreversibly changed by things outside our control, we can still choose who we want to be. Even when it's hard, even when the influences are strong, even when it's downright traumatic. Oscar's story is about self discovery and self acceptance; about choice and change. Regardless of if Oz fades into the background, or his curse is broken, or they become a blendy merge of the two of them, Oscar is still going to remain his own person in some way by the end of it. Because this is ultimately a happy story and that is the main driving conflict of his personal arc.
The assumption that Oscar is going to get absorbed or overwritten by Ozpin being such a common take in this fandom never ceases to confuse me because of that. It also confuses me because the show - while it doesn't fully explain the extent of the merge mechanics - has told us that Oz has had families in his previous lives by "learning to live with the souls with which he had been paired".
The other allegory I'll mention - of which I am not the first, nor necessarily the best, to be pointing out (here is a great example from a little while ago) - is one for plurality. Some of the friends I've made in RG spaces have DID and have spoken to me about how they interpret the Ozcar situation; how it's similar or different to their own experiences. Hearing those stories, once again, makes it really hard for me to see Ozpin as any sort of deal-breaking barrier to a rosegarden relationship. This idea that Oscar must be isolated from his friends and constantly scrutinized when showing interest towards any romantic partners because of Oz's presence lacks both imagination and compassion for me. Oscar never asked for this curse, he didn't do anything to deserve it, and to condemn him to a lonely life because of something like that seems really antithetical to the themes of this story and to the characters involved. While some characters within the story might have some doubts about the relationship, at the end of the day it is not up to them on what Ruby and Oscar decide to do for themselves.
Again, this isn't aimed at you, Anon. I just wanted to say my piece on it given how pervasive this topic is. I truly look forward to the day where folks can talk about RG without this being the first thought or argument that everyone jumps to.
#sorry#but if i had a dollar for every time someone brought up the 'but there's an old man in his head' argument#i could probably fund v10's production by now#ask#asks#anon#discourse#kind of#rwby rosegarden#oscar pine#idk man. it's a story about breaking cycles and hope and fighting for a better world#it's right there in the lost fable and in 'you're your own person'#it's just such a strawman argument to me now and i'm tired#live a little. use your imagination. stop worrying about oz in oscar's head and worry abt killing the an/ti rhetoric in your own
31 notes
·
View notes
Text

Today was the second or third time my boss asked me to show this to everyone we work with
#genuinely maybe my favorite image of all time#my coworkers asked why i ‘think of it every day’#and i had to explain i often get into imagined arguments#defending the central valley
12 notes
·
View notes
Note
for real WHERE does the idea that [utdr humans] are nongendered so that "you can project on them" come from. their literal character arcs are about NOT being a blank slate to be filled in by the audience
i think i understand the assumption on some level for undertale, because there is a very intentional effort to make you identify with the "player character" in order to make your choices feel like your own (the beating heart of undertale's metanarrative lies in giving you an alternative path to violence against its enemies after all, and whether you're still willing to persue it for your own selfish reasons. YOUR agency is crucial).
of course, the cardinal plot twist of the main ending sweeps the rug from under your feet on that in every way, and frisk's individuality becomes, in turn, a tool to further UT's OTHER main theme: completionism as a form of diegetic violence within the story. replaying the game would steal frisk's life and happy ending from them for our own perverse sentimentality, emotionally forcing our hand away from the reset button.
i think their neutrality absolutely aids in that immersion. but also, there's this weird attitude by (mostly) cis fans where it being functional within the story makes it... somehow "editable" and "up to the player" as well? which is gross and shows their ass on how they approach gender neutrality in general lol.
but also like. there's plenty of neutral, non PCharacters in undertale and deltarune. even when undertale was just an earthbound fangame and the player immersion metanarrative was completely absent, toby still described frisk as a "young, androgynous person". sometimes characters are just neutral by design. it's not that hard to understand lol.
anyone who makes this argument for kris deltarune is braindead. nothing else to say about it.
#this is a very difficult topic to discuss imo because on Some level I don't completely disagree with people who make that argument for chara#in SPIRIT. if not in action. like my point still stands characters can just Be neutral. and if that level of customization had been intended#well Pokemon's been doing the ''are you a boy or a girl'' shtick for ages. no reason why that couldn't have been included as well#but i do feel that we're supposed to identify with chara within the story. not as in chara is us but as in we are chara#and i think someone playing the game without outside interferences and (wrongly) coming to the conclusion that chara IS literally#themselves in the story. and thus call them by their own name (the one they likely inputted at the start) and pronouns#will be someone who grasped undertale's metanarrative more than someone who went in already spoiled on the NM route who thinks of chara#(and on some level frisk as well) as completely separate from us with independent wills and personhoods at any time#who treats them as nonbinary. even if their approach is more ''appropriate'' to a gender neutral person#systematic error vs manually changing every measure to fit what you already think is going to be the correct result. ykwim?#of course this opens a whole new parentheses while discussing the game outside of your personal experience#because even if you DO see chara as a self insert then they are a self insert for EVERYONE. women men genderqueer people#i don't call chara ''biscia'' even though that's what i named the fallen human in my playthrough. neither do i use they because i also do#if you're describing the character/story objectively in how they are executed then you're going to talk about them neutrally#because you ain't the only sunovabitch who played the darn game sonny#so like. either way you turn it. even in the most self insert reading you'd STILL logically use they/them so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ git gud#answered asks
119 notes
·
View notes
Text
face in hands please for the love of allt hat is holy people stop complaining about rha.to with the same tired old complaints that really betray that you didnt' fucking read it or if you did you didn't absorb it. Like on one hand I don't fucking blame you it generally sucks but K.ori has a LOT of heart and she is not actually amnesiac this is made very readily apparent really early on. Ro.y is not in character exactly/maybe in character if you went all the way back to him as a teenager but he's definitely not incompetent!!! (Tynion I'm not talking to you fuck you you made his competence very... weird and conditional) DI.CK IS STILL A RELEVANT PERSON TO THEM HE'S JUST NOT THE FOCUS OF THE FUCKING STORY. N52 is the reason they're "backslid" and haven't been on the JL/Outside.rs NOT RHAT.O because that choice is a by-product of the full universe reboot and abbreviated timeline.
and, of course, let's not forget that Jason gets fucked over worse than anyone else in this entire shitshow <3 His entire lore gets centered around fucking j.oker. He's dumb as shit. Do NOT get me started on the forced romance that falls flat at every turn. This godawful characterization for his "redemption" is what we're stuck with being the basis for his character even now!!!!!
#ax rants#I'm tired fo the same arguments every fucking time let's talk about something new for once that actualyl tells me you read it.#let's discuss how Tynion's attempts to “make them more like NTT” actualyl fucked up#like Kori would never have continually argued to abandon a friend but he had her do that so Roy could be the “heart” of the group#let's discuss the fact that Jason was relatively not smart under Lobdell than absolute fucking moronic under Tynion#WHO RUNS AWAY TO JOIN A GROUP OF ASSASSINS WHEN THEY'RE UPSET ABOUT KILLING PEOPLE???
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
the finale is making me lose my goddamn mind, cause this man obviously told all the guards not to let anything happen to gihun cause okay, the first time he tries to kill himself he is also beefing with the guards and grabs one of their rifles so maybe it makes sense to tie him to a bed but BUT why tf would they care if a player kills themselves normally (they DON'T, one of them LITERALLY DOES???) but when gihun tries to slit his throat and the end of hide and seek the guards are on his ass, shoot the knife out of hand, knock him out and tie him to the bed AGAIN
then he gives him the goddamn knife and even when he doesn't do what he was supposed to do with it he doesn't take it back. so you're telling me that after ALL this care he put into keeping him alive he didn't have a contingency plan for if he FALLS OFF THE PLATFORM DURING THE LAST ROUND???
edit: completely fucking forgot that the guards also broke down the door and forbid player violence when the old crusty men tried to go after the baby the first time. you know they don't care because this is how saebyeok died and gihun screamed his lungs out and they didn't give shit but here???
inho broke every. single. rule. of his own damn game for gihun up until that point. this is where he stopped caring?
and maybe, i dont know, you could say that he realized that he cannot break gihun, that he will never be like him, and something snapped, wanted to teach him a lesson. but he went out of his way to give gihun's money to his daughter??? like he didn't HAVE to do any of that??? he *personally* went to his hotel, got his money, and went to the usa to *personally* hand deliver those winnings to gayoung??
SO DID U CARE OR DID U NOT CARE. YOU COULD'VE SAVED HIM SOMEHOW, SO WHY DIDN'T YOU?
#squid game#squid game spoilers#squid game season 3#i dont care about tags just SPOILERS OKAY??#imma be honest holy shit was junho and noeul's plotlines a waste of goddamn time#like dont get me wrong i like them both but DUDE. I DONT CARE#we needed more screentime for literally EVERYTHING ELSE#like whatever the fuck daeho had going on??#inner monologue for gihun??? while he is having a mental breakdown???#flashbacks??? hello??#THE MEETING BETWEEN GIHUN AND INHO??? what the FUCK was that???#'this is gonna take a while' WHAT? GIVING HIM A FCKING KNIFE?? really the youngil sideplot's climax is gihun looking angry and waving#the damn knife?? he STILL DOESNT KNOW HIS REAL NAME. NOTHING. NO QUESTIONS? NO ARGUMENT?#5 DAMN MINUTES? FIVE.#the rage queen rages#my rant tag has never been so relevant#lim just so '???' over many things??? im not specifically angry about the deaths like... obviously almost everyone was gonna die#but the ending seemed less like 'this is the story i want to tell' and more like#'i NEED gihun to die at the end how do i twist every event to make that happen'#ohhhhh im pissed. ooooooooooooooooooooooo im so pissed. brb gonna live on ao3 for the next month thanks bye
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
Maybe it is because I am Kathony fan and Polin fan, maybe I have been around this fandom too long who knows 😂 But the argument/ complaints about this season are the exact arguments people had about Kathony in S2. Like the “ Too many side stories” the “not enough scenes of just them” was literally the same exact complaints people had.
S2 and S3 follow the same outline/ format, and will probably be the same format they follow for the rest of the series. ( Queen Charlotte is formatted as a limited series and S1 came out before they were renewed so they had to put a bow on the stories in case they weren’t renewed ) Do I wish we would have got more Colin and Penelope scenes? Absolutely. Are there things outside of these complaints that I wish were done differently? Sure, I am a firm believer you can enjoy something and wish things were done differently. I have had complaints about parts of every season. But this is something that is probably not going to change anytime soon.
#like want something soley focused on whatever couple you enjoy?#read the books#want something soley focused on the couple you enjoy in the show universe?#read fanfic#the show has always been an ensemble#there is always going to be other stories going on#all these characters are in different places in their story and vastly different than their book counterparts#personally s3 was the best about incorporating book moments and aspects into the show version#tbh I think the closest we will get to an exact book pairing is Simon and Daphne#and I think thats just because they were s1 and had no time to be anything different#are we probably still going to have this argument after every season? yes#is it still going to be exhausting? also yes 😅#bridgerton#polin#kathony
44 notes
·
View notes
Text
periodically my brother wanders into my texts to try to explain his theory of reality to me. his theory is that human experience and love are fundamental to the universe and the most real thing, more real than physics, and in fact they create physics— until i reply to ask clarifying questions about this theory or describe my arguments against it, in which case it shifts to be only a claim about human society only for the duration of the next three texts before going back. when i eventually point out that these don't agree with each other he says that's because actually the true idea is inexpressible and this is just its nature. then i ask why he thinks it will work to communicate an inexpressible idea that requires inconsistency over the span of a conversation, and why, if he's trying to do that, he opened by trying to claim that science is wrong because it claims human emotions are an identical time-invariant experience for everyone over their lifespan and then abandoned that claim as soon as i pointed out that science absolutely doesn't say that even a little. then he says actually the idea is His Whole Self and then stops texting me back
i realize i should just stop before the first step where i respond but i want to talk to my brother! and i want to show him the respect of actually trying to engage with things he says to me! and none of this bothers me enough to not want to do those things! but also, christ
#like come on man at least commit to holding an incompatible philosophical belief from me#if we just ran aground on him believing in souls or w/e i would still think his beliefs were majestically bad and ill-founded but we#would have a disagreement.#this is just stupid.#box opener#sorry for talking about this it's just so fucking annoying and i have used up all my powers of forebearance on never telling him that#i think he's entirely motivated by just wanting to feel superior to scientists using made-up claims about science because he's still#mad that our parents were less supportive of his art career than my science career when we were teenagers#and is just saying random things that he thinks let him stake out the moral high ground over... the concept of measuring things.#i think he has an extremely legitimate grievance about the art career thing! that was miserable and arbitrary and not something#he should have had to deal with and i think i could have done more than i did to support him at the time.#i also accordingly think i probably owe it to him not to deploy that part of his life in an argument#but like. i am kind of tired of every three years fielding some random new accusation that my chosen career path makes me#incapable of aesthetic sensibility or love or genuine expression or whatever the fuck it is this time.
17 notes
·
View notes
Text

Hornet at Herrah's Altar • Dec. 2023
#p#composition#sonnet#archive#hornet#hollow knight#baby's first metrical break...what do we think.........#local poet is shocked to learn it has improved in the last 2 years despite writing very little. more at whatever time it wakes up#if you were there for my first hornet sonnet this is a rewrite of it that's actually good 🫶#I've always always always had fun playing with her relationship to the radiance...like she has to just. Not Dream and Not Want or else she#will fall to the infection. I guess you could make the argument that being a demigod grants her immunity but that's less interesting to me#The fight to remember her life and herself through the years of stasis while also shutting every emotion down. I think what we see of her i#the game—esp her emotion towards the end—is the cracks in her armor that she deliberately doesn't fix because she knows one way or another#all of this will end. the burden is off her shoulders
109 notes
·
View notes
Text
The whole discourse about the privacy/secrecy/support thing has been sitting with me for a few days (I mean other than it always does to a certain degree) thanks to all the excellent discussion happening and I know I'm not saying anything that hasn't been said a million times before, but I think what we're seeing and what we're going to learn (e.g. from TTPD) is that it wasn't just the support issue, but how it was shown/handled.
We've all gone out of our way to show that introversion =/= lack of support. Someone can be shy, reserved, etc. and still show up for their partner, whether in public or at home. To chalk any of the differences up to the clash between introversion and extroversion is unfair to folks who count themselves among either tbh.
@thisisctrying said something the other day that hit the nail on the head about how if that support had been offered in private, there very well may not have been a Joever to begin with, or at least not at this point in time. (Sorry for loosely paraphrasing, and for namedropping you! Long time listener, first time poster.)
If this were a case where the "shy" partner said, "I am really uncomfortable with the spotlight personally and do not want to court it, but I will support you in your ambitions and offer you whatever you need to make them happen and make the glare bearable," I suspect that would have gone a long way to making Taylor feel seen and comfortable in pursuing her goals in the way that she now has. Again, that might have been more akin to the balance that seemed to have been struck around 2019 from what we can see, but even speaking in a general sense, there are lots of couples out there, celebrity or not, that have similar approaches where there are highly driven people and busy careers involved.
(A famous example being Dolly Parton's marriage. Tbh I know next to nothing about her and Carl, but she's always heralded as an example in this regard, because her husband is famously uncomfortable with the spotlight and hasn't accompanied her to public events in decades, but she's said that she never minded that because that was always work to her, and what was important was that he supported her in pursuing all her career goals and basically ensured she had a place to call home to return to at the end of the day.)
We're kind of in a brave new world with her current relationship because it felt like, at least at the start, we were maybe watching her figure out her boundaries in real time as to what she was comfortable with or not and adjust accordingly. Like so many have said, I fully believe the extreme privacy thing was initially driven by herself and her experiences in 2016, and she needed that quiet time to recover from all of the things and figure out how to exist in the world again.
Stating the obvious, it seemed like eventually privacy was equated with secrecy, turning the relationship and the celebrity into the elephant in the room and something to never be spoken of to the outside world. People are free to choose whatever works best for themselves and their relationships, and for some the separate public lives might work, but the “kept me like a secret but I kept you like an oath” theme is all over her work and it’s clear that it’s a sore spot for her, because she’s been made to feel shame just for the life she leads so many times in the past.
What I’m trying to say is that it’s pretty obvious something Not Great was happening behind the scenes, which didn’t just amount to “she wanted to be a public celebrity and he wanted to be a private hermit.” (Also, in case anyone forgot, this is a person who also chose a public-facing career who also has to engage in press for it, but I digress.) As her career reached new heights post-folklore, if she had the support at home to do all the things without judgment and with encouragement, and in turn offer the same support to her partner, she may have very well lived just fine with that, not unlike Dolly Parton’s case.
By reading between the lines in all the press since, as well as comments on tour and general ~vibes~ with TTPD teasers, it seems like one of the issues was that that was likely not the case. There was all the stuff that we saw — the reticence to acknowledge each other in the media (particularly on one side), the lack of public support even at events at which they were both in attendance for their respective jobs, the great lengths they went to not to be photographed together at events they attended yet no problem taking pictures with other friends and coworkers, the jobs that separated them, the withdrawing from the public even for work accomplishments, etc. Which could all be manageable if a couple chooses to do so together and are not inherently a sign of trouble in themselves.
But what we’re seeing now I think is a reflection of the things we weren’t seeing then, and it seems to indicate some very deep hurt. (I know, call me Captain Obvious.) And like so many have been saying, it feels likely that that part of that hurt is rooted in that very lack of private support where a person would expect it from their partner. Obviously as a Taylor fan blog I’m going to be more inclined to understand her side of a story, but tbh, it’s also because… this is sooooooo common, and something I’ve experienced in my friend group. (@taylortruther is right when she says most breakups are the same one way or another lol.)
One partner is resentful of the other’s success, or resentful that the other’s priorities begin to evolve as new experiences unlock new goals, or feels the other’s ambitions are not worthy of pursuit, and coupled with perhaps their own struggles in the same domain, it’s easy to see where that can chip away at the other partner’s morale and faith in the relationship. I know I’m just speculating here, but I also don’t think it’s totally unfounded. (Again, because a) I’m picking up what she’s putting down and b) it happens to sooooooo many women even among us dull normals.)
With all the pointed mentions about how much Taylor feels supported in her current relationship and how she in turn loves to offer the same show of support to not only her partner but other loved ones, how she’s stepped out more in the last year to a whole host of events, how she’s mentioned feeling like she locked herself away for years and she’s just proud of her partner and happy she can show up for him even if the chaos around it is unsettling, it paints a picture of what perhaps was happening before last year.
To feel like you’re all alone in carrying the weight of the relationship (or burden of it), of twisting yourself into knots to accommodate the other person’s boundaries (or insecurities) but not feeling reciprocity for your own has to be so painful. (The idea that it may have been even darker and to have a partner not only be unreceptive to your own needs but even perhaps resentful/dismissive/belittling of them is even more painful to think of. I guess we’ll find out when TTPD comes out if that was the case, too.)
At a certain point, that lack of acknowledgement will force your hand to be able to reclaim yourself. And it feels like the further removed Taylor in particular is from it, the more she moves from being sad about the life she felt she gave up by leaving, to angry at the life she felt she was giving up by staying. Especially being in a relationship now where it seems like everything comes much easier, where she can be open about the person she’s with and show up for them, all the stuff that seemed as challenging as climbing Mount Everest in her past is nothing more than a molehill at best in her current life.
TL;DR: I don’t think it’s privacy that inherently spells doom for a celebrity relationship like this; it’s the mutual support and respect that does. If Taylor had felt that in the later years of her previous relationship, I think we could be seeing a different, though not necessarily unfulfilled, person right now in 2024, who’d be happy on tour but whose personal life would look a little different. But it seems like by losing that support she lost parts of herself, and we’ve seen her reclaim that in spades in the last year, and perhaps to degrees she didn’t even realize she could from before all the Bad Stuff started happening in her young adulthood.
I know this was extremely long-winded and unnecessary, especially about total strangers we only know through scraps fed through the media, but I just always bristle at this idea that issues like these boil down to “personality differences,” as though one person wants to live in a city and the other on a remote island, or some shit like that. The whole support (and gender tbh) issue is one that’s just very close to my heart because again, I have seen it play out with so many of my friends in long term relationships and marriages and I just think people in relationships (and women in particular in some circles) deserve better than to feel like they’re being, well, tolerated.
#thisisctrying and taylortruther sorry for tagging you two!#can remove if needed!#but you guys made me think a lot#this was inspired by a conversation i had with a friend the other day#where she relayed an argument she had with her partner#who basically felt slighted that he wasn’t getting acknowledgement for all the housework he does — which is. just. the dishes#and she was like ‘wow congrats you’ve done the dishes — i do every other fucking thing to keep this household afloat in ways you see#and don’t see and i never ask for praise because it’s just stuff that needs to get done because that’s how you support your family’#and it just reminded me that some partners (and a certain kind of man in particular) just… think their struggles take precedence#when their partners drown in them everyday but keep things afloat out of necessity and are never recognized or supported for it#(my friends have shitty husbands/boyfriends can you tell lol)#long post#again the way i just feel like i know the vibes of ttpd in my bones are 😵💫#i feel like i have a lot more thoughts but I’m trying to be more gracious and less parasocial so#also just want to again defend the introverts of the world by reiterating that being introverted does not mean unsupportive#being a shitty partner does though!#writing letters addressed to the fire#it’s also just like… i feel like if Taylor had had even a modicum of the support in private and even public she needed#she’d probably still be with you know who and wouldn’t have considered leaving let alone doing it#because it would have felt like enough and like it was what was needed for both of them#whereas we’re seeing a completely new side of her open up now because this is the first time she’s ever had that support from a partner#in her adult life at least#and it’s like it’s opening up things she didn’t know she needed or wanted#muses acquired like bruises
56 notes
·
View notes
Text
got into a fight with my mom yippeeee
#meg speaks#feeling. super.#and all because she has that dumb as shit mindset of#'well you havent had [thing i dont like] for years so you dont know if you still don't like it or not'#newsflash. i do still know that i don't like it. i haven't liked it since i was like. fucking 6 years old. every time i have tried it since#i have fucking HATED it#every time she forced me to try it again it was disgusting to me.#i dont like it. i haven't liked it in a long LONG time. over 20 years of hating it#sometimes she would sit me at the table and make me stay there until i tried it again.#me telling her that she would do that is what upset her#because HER mom did that to HER and she HATED IT. and swore she would never do it to her kids.#but i fucking remember sitting at the dinner table an hour or more after everyone else had finished and cleaned up#and how she would get angry with me if i just trashed my plate without trying it#she wasn't anywhere as bad as her mom. but she still did it to me too.#and just like her mom she denies having ever done it.#and thinks i'm crazy and that i don't remember what happened and that im just saying it to upset her.#but im not. it happened to me. she did it to me. and it's her fault that she's upset over this because she's the one#who can't let it go. that i don't like this food.#it would be so so so SO easy to just accept that i don't like it. we wouldn't have had the argument if she would have accepted it.#but she never will. and i'm getting to be too old now to be talked to like i'm 4 years old.
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
also this isnt really proper shade at larian or anything and the writing of this game is SAURE good so dont take it this way but.
i sure do wish. Minthara was not villain batted as hard as she was. Her being locked to "evil" runs and being mutually exclusive with several party members. Her being nothing more than a miniboss for your average player- who does not even know shes a potential party member! Her being so chronically unloved by the community because... shes the "evil" companion. Hell, even the amount of people saying frankly really edgy shit about killing her or hurting her completely unprompted lmao. Like I genuinely think shes been pretty unfairly demonized both by the community and by the meta of just like... the game itself because she's really actually..... kind of, dare I say, sweet? if you get to know her. ugh.
#also if i had two nickles. shes sylvanas all over again lads i fear#idk obviously larian handles her character much better than wow ever handled sylvanas but its genuinely like#kind of eerie how similar they are and how hard they where both villain batted considering how evil they actually are#ESP compared to their male counterparts#like i would argue that neither of them are any more evil- and likely are even less evil- than a lot of the men in the same game that#are not villain batted at all.#like every character in warcraft is a war criminal so sylvanas is hardly uniquely evil on that front#and i have a hard time buying that minthara is anymore inherently evil than astarion lol#idk again larian handles trauma much better and it feels... inauthentic to accuse them of not treating minthara well because shes#traumatized. thats def not the argument im making here but it IS really sad to relate to / find catharsis in another traumatized elf#only for her to be. villain batted just like the last one :/#idk. its just a bummer.#like again thankfully its not a thesis of larians like. karlach and shadowheart and laezel are all beautiful and wonderful examples of like#traumatized women allowed to be angry and validated for being angry#BUT im selfish haha i want my bestie minthara to be able to have a happy ending w the rest of us and i dont want to see her demonized for#idk being a traumatized angry woman like!! it seems outta place for that to be the message but#whatever im rambling ive lost the plot#my post
72 notes
·
View notes